Free Tool

Database Migration Assessor

Assess the complexity, estimate the effort, and identify risks for your database migration - whether moving between engines, cloud providers, or on-premise to cloud.

Enter Your Details

Total size of the database being migrated
Includes stored procedures, functions, triggers, and views
Applications, APIs, or services that connect to this database

Migration Complexity Matrix - Source vs Target

Source → TargetSQL ServerPostgreSQLMySQLMongoDBOracle
SQL ServerLowModerateModerateHighModerate
OracleModerateModerate–HighHighVery HighLow
MySQLModerateLow–ModerateLowHighModerate
PostgreSQLModerateLowLow–ModerateHighModerate
MongoDBHighHighHighLowHigh
OtherHighHighHighVery HighHigh

Complexity ratings assume moderate schema complexity and standard data types. Stored procedures, triggers, and custom types increase complexity significantly. Talk to our migration team

More Free Tools

Try our other free IT calculators and planning tools.

Frequently asked questions

Complexity depends primarily on schema size, data volume, and how compatible your source and target database systems are - migrating between similar systems is typically straightforward, while cross-platform migrations, for example SQL Server to PostgreSQL, usually require significant schema and query rework. This assessor scores your project against these factors.

For a small-to-mid-sized UK SME database, migrations typically take 2-8 weeks including planning, testing, and cutover, though complex cross-platform migrations with custom application dependencies can take several months. Testing and validation usually take longer than the actual data transfer itself.

The most common causes are underestimating data cleanup needs, undiscovered application dependencies on database-specific features, and insufficient testing time before cutover. Most UK SMEs also underestimate the staff time needed for validation, which is why this assessor weighs schema complexity and compatibility heavily.

It depends on the migration method - a straightforward lift-and-shift typically requires a planned maintenance window of a few hours, while a phased or replication-based migration can reduce downtime to minutes at the cost of a more complex project. Most UK SMEs opt for a scheduled out-of-hours cutover to minimise disruption.

Technology Stack

Powered by industry-leading technologies including SolarWinds, Cloudflare, BitDefender, AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Cisco Meraki to deliver secure, scalable, and reliable IT solutions.

SolarWinds
Cloudflare
BitDefender
AWS
Hono
Opus
Office 365
Microsoft
Cisco Meraki
Microsoft Azure

Latest Articles

24
  • Virtual CIO

Virtual CIO vs IT Consultant: A UK Business Guide to Understanding the Difference Before You Hire in 2026

24 Sep, 2026

The difference between a virtual CIO and an IT consultant is not a difference of skill, seniority or subject knowledge. The same individual can credibly do...

Read more
23
  • Network Admin

Network Documentation: A UK Business Guide to Building a Network Map That Actually Gets Used in 2026

23 Sep, 2026

Network documentation is the thing every UK business agrees it should have and almost none of them actually has in a usable state. There is usually something:...

Read more
22
  • IT Office Moves

Office Move IT Checklist for Hybrid Teams: A UK Business Guide to Relocating Without Disrupting Remote Workers in 2026

22 Sep, 2026

A hybrid office relocation is a different problem from the one most move checklists were written to solve. The traditional plan treats the building as the unit...

Read more

Enquiry Received!

Thank you for getting in touch. A member of our team will review your enquiry and get back to you within 24 hours.